I am embarrassed to be a Libertarian today

I have been a registered Libetarian since the first George Bush was President.

I have been an acting Libertartian since I was a kid.

Today, I am ashamed to tell someone that I belong to this party.

I received an email this morning from a friend who told me about some horrific posts made by Libertarians in, of all places, New Hampshire.

I will not repeat the ugly, stupid and antithesis to liberty posts here but suffice it to say, some idiots in the "Live Free or Die" state have absolutely no clue what it means to be a genuine lover of liberty.

The foundational principle of Libertarian thought is that we all have a natural, or God-given right to our life, or liberty and our property.  This applies to every human being on the planet, including Democratic candidate for President, Kamala Harris.

Since 2016 I have watched as many so-called Libertarians have voted for Donald Trump - a person who has very few Libertarian positions and a lot of statist, nationalistic and anti-freedom ones.

I did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020.  I will not vote for him this year.

But I am now leaning towards staying home on election day rather than vote for the candidate from my party.

This country is in big trouble.   The Republicans look nothing like the party of Ronald Reagan.    The Democrats continue to embrace the failure of socialism, and now I have people in my party calling for ending the life of another human being.

This disgusting use of social media comes from a twisted view of what liberty means.

On behalf of genuine liberty lovers all over the United States I would like to apologize to Kamala Harris.

Tyranny in Venezuela

 I wanted to share this link to a story about a brave, liberty loving young woman in Venezuela and what has happened to her for standing up for her rights.

https://ladiesofliberty.org/maria-oporeza/

Kamala Harris Flunks basic Economics

This will not take long.... Kamala Harris is running on a platform that includes imposing nationwide price ceilings on groceries. 

Aside from the arrogance of believing she is an expert in what prices should look like, there are two incredibly stupid flaws with her plan. 

First, if the government forces food prices down in the name of "fairness" to consumers, it will cause food suppliers to reduce output. This is because if prices are below the direct and opportunity cost of supplying these goods, it would be irrational to continue to supply. 

Second, if prices are driven down artificially, consumers will try to buy more. The combination of reduced output and greater purchasing attempts will cause shortages. Just like in Venezuela. Just like when Nixon did this in the early 1970's. Just like in the former Soviet Union. 

Why propose something so economically idiotic then? 

When Richard Nixon came out with his plan to freeze food prices the voters were so happy that he was re-elected in a landslide. 

That is because the vast majority of voters are economically ignorant. So, if voters want low prices and they are ignorant about where prices come from, it makes perfect POLITICAL sense to propose price controls.

 And that is why she did it. 

Afterall, she can't actually believe price ceilings will work.....

Why Kamala Harris might be worse than Joe Biden

>What follows is from the July 22, 2024 Wall Street Journal As a senator, Harris supported Medicare for All, which would shift the healthcare system from private and employer-based insurance to a government-run program. 

But in 2020, during her run for the White House, she released a more moderate proposal to expand access to Medicare while keeping private insurance intact. And since joining Biden’s presidential ticket, Harris has backed his plan, which calls for building on the Affordable Care Act.On trade, Harris opposed two recent major trade deals that Biden supported, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. 

Harris was one of just 10 senators who voted against the USMCA, a renegotiated version of the North American Free Trade Agreement under the Trump administration, arguing the environmental provisions were insufficient. 

She also opposed TPP as a Senate candidate, arguing it didn’t do enough to protect the environment and worker regulations. Harris’s climate record has arguably been the most liberal part of her policy portfolio. She has backed the Green New Deal and supported banning fracking. Biden ran on a fracking ban, but only for oil and gas production from federal lands. 

As president, Biden did more to address climate change than any of his predecessors spending $1 trillion in tax credits, grants and loans for clean energy. As a presidential candidate, Harris proposed a full repeal of the 2017 tax cuts enacted by Trump and congressional Republicans.

 Biden as a candidate and as president has backed leaving in place the tax cuts for people making under $400,000 and fully paying for those extensions with new taxes on companies and high-income households. During her campaign, she also favored raising estate taxes. 

 While in the Senate, she proposed an expansive tax credit for lower-income and middle-income workers worth up to $3,000 for individuals and $6,000 for married couples. That idea, worth more than $2 trillion over a decade, would have tilted the tax code to be much more progressive. It didn’t make it into the Biden agenda, though it has some similarities to the child tax credit that was in place for 2021.

Did Racism create Capitalism?

Back in 2022 I invited Ibram X. Kendi, author of "How to be an Antiracist' to join me at Valencia to debate his contention that captialism was born out of racism. He did not make it, but here is a speech you might find useful to answer this imporant question.